3 ms·
It was pretty much always open source and cross platform. The original version wasn't even developed on windows: https://github.com/SSCLI/sscli20_20060311 https
by hughrr 5y ago
It was pretty much always open source and cross platform. The original version wasn't even developed on windows: https://github.com/SSCLI/sscli20_20060311 https://github.com/SSCLI/sscli20_20060311
Although being open source and free doesn't necessarily make it open and accessible. The core CLR team do not listen to customers, particularly ones who complain about not wanting telemetry by default in there, ones who open bugs in the HTTP stack which spam logs for months and months and months and complete deadlocks and crashes.
Open Source has only completely absolved Microsoft of any responsibility to support their products to actual paying customers, who are told to open github issues now which are auto-closed after being ignored. I'd rather invest my time in any other platform without the other issues that it brings at this point.
- electroly 5y agoThat bit about SSCLI is only about half true, at best. The original version of .NET was developed on Windows, but they contracted Corel to implement the cross-platform bits they wanted for SSCLI. Those bits only existed in SSCLI; it was never integrated into the actual commercial .NET implementation. SSCLI is not a snapshot of the actual .NET Framework code; not like the later Reference Source is.