3 ms·
FCKEditor was a bit cleaner, IMO. But only marginally. Also, there was ‘WYMeditor’, which displayed the semantic structure of text instead of a WYSIWYG renditi
by aasasd 5y ago
FCKEditor was a bit cleaner, IMO. But only marginally.
Also, there was ‘WYMeditor’, which displayed the semantic structure of text instead of a WYSIWYG rendition—so I kept meaning to try it out some time, but never got around to it in earnest. Textile and Markdown took hold before I again had a need for a complex editor, which is probably for the better.
(Now, if we convince all the ‘whitepaper’¹ authors that their incredibly complex layout of ‘a wall of text and occasional pictures’ doesn't require PDF and that I don't have a 14" portrait-oriented screen—that would be great.)
(¹ as opposed to greenpaper, I guess.)
- ihateolives 5y agoI wish we could've used Textile back then, I used it for my personal blog, but it was no go since the users were Word-people who literally made html pages with Word and tried to upload those to CMS. Oh, that brings back memories... Trying to clean up a mess that resulted from users pasting rich content from Word to our content editor and then wondering why it broke their site from certain point onwards.