7 ms·
Oracle has typically been a licensing centric company. The "named user plus" licensing thing can be unwieldy for most small firms. The past few years have been
by goombastic 15y ago
Oracle has typically been a licensing centric company. The "named user plus" licensing thing can be unwieldy for most small firms. The past few years have been bad for it as a result. SAAS based innovation, unconventional databases, database scaling bottlenecks, parallelization, in-memory computing, mobility and a lot of the low cost innovations around these have emerged as a threat to Oracle. The options it has had are acquiring OpenSource and aggressively defending patents. All the while its marketing teams continue to whitewash offerings like exalogic as "cloud" offerings.
I feel that Oracle tends to explore options to corral innovation. Its OpenSource portfolio is the classic trojan horse. Expect all sorts of lock-in.
- toyg 15y agoI'm sorry, you're sorely mistaken. I've worked at Oracle (been acquired) and i've seen numbers. Licensing is not the main source of profits, support is; they might sell it differently, but that's where they make the real dough. The margins are astonishing. And look at the numbers they just posted about Europe: +50%. At these levels, that's huge.
- goombastic 15y agoI agree. All I wanted to point out was the difficulty in using their stack if you are a small firm or an innovator.