3 ms·
>Again, this can be done without using a blockchain. How so? I won't bother with the rest of the post as it's your usual crypto bad spiel that has absolutely
by birracerveza 5y ago
>Again, this can be done without using a blockchain.
How so?
I won't bother with the rest of the post as it's your usual crypto bad spiel that has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion we're currently having and has absolutely nothing to back up its claims (as do the rest of your posts, which I'm surprised aren't flagged/dead yet considering their low quality, but I guess HN is ok with them since they're anti crypto), but I'm curious to see how you would build a decentralized system that lets developers build data indexing programs, allows anyone to join the decentralized network as a data provider to run those programs, and lets consumers query that data from the network while also ensuring that the data is valid and hasn't been tampered with by the providers without blockchain/tokens.
Please, do enlighten me, I'm curious.
- birracerveza 5y agoYep, that's exactly what I thought.
- colesantiago 5y agoYou thought wrong, since nobody in this space actually cares about the technology. Like all the others, most people are just speculating on the token price, asking if it is a good investment, etc. You would have to be lying to yourself to believe that people care about the technology. Could you tell me why does this project needs a token attached? Even if we were to look at the price, the painful truth is that most (if not all) people who invested lost most of their money on this shitcoin, and this is excluding the punishing gas fees so it could be even worse. I hope this doesn't include you as well. As I said, querying blockchains can be done without the need to attach a token to a project. BitQuery is an example of this without trying to burn up the planet with Proof of Waste. If you are in support of the Graph you are also in support of the ponzi scheme.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]