3 ms·
> They responded in kind? Replying with additional legal threats isn't what I would call "responding in kind". But to quote the original article: "I am happy
by sdoering 5y ago
> They responded in kind?
Replying with additional legal threats isn't what I would call "responding in kind".
But to quote the original article:
"I am happy to report I have removed the names of your employees from my article. I don’t do this because you threatened me, but because I am an ethical person, and ethical people do not deliberately seek to cause distress in others (for example, by sending thousands upon thousands of unethical legal threats)."
- waffle_maniac 5y agoLegal threat is a temper tantrum in this case. They are sparring pointlessly.