Is that really true? On traditional exchanges, the exchange itself is a mostly neutral party, a technology-and-marketplace provider. If a clearing member beco

Is that really true? On traditional exchanges, the exchange itself is a mostly neutral party, a technology-and-marketplace provider. If a clearing member becomes insolvent, the other clearing members have agreements in place to "pitch in" together to keep the whole system functional. (Edit: to be clear, this isn't a rosy situation: it's usually a adjacent to fraud, so the SEC, CFTC, etc. pursue criminal charges; and other clearing members tend to sue the bankrupt one, letting the courts figure it out.)