5 ms·
Right, that makes sense, but that's not really relevant to what I assume is the half life of a specific strand of DNA, right?
by anamexis 5y ago
Right, that makes sense, but that's not really relevant to what I assume is the half life of a specific strand of DNA, right?
- egberts1 5y agoHalf-life of 542 assumes to mean without an active mitochondria engine to keep its strand largely intact. Error rate during active lifespan is real. Gamma ray probably is the largest contributor of active (or even inactive) DNA being disturbed.