4 ms·
Ask HN: Why can't profs get grants for engineering (rather than research)?
- ameminator 5y agoI'm not sure I understand what you mean by "engineering". Is the government supposed to fund a professor's company somehow? Is it supposed to be through the university? Some of that does happen now, but it always starts out as research. Many universities have a "industry partnership" program, either directly selling the research or starting companies to commercialize the research directly.
- amichail 5y agoYou can build something without necessarily trying to sell it. You don't need a company for engineering.
- ameminator 5y agoFair enough - but then how are we to decide which of these "personal engineering projects" to fund? If there is some knowledge or other benefit, how come it can't be fit into the framework of a grant proposal?
- jqpabc123 5y agoIt's simply not their job. Research is the quest for new knowledge. Engineering is the application of existing knowledge in creative and unique ways. Being a good professor/researcher doesn't necessarily mean you are a good engineer. Just like an architect may be good at conceptualizing a building --- but they will typically hire an engineer (often legally required) if they need to make sure the building can withstand a hurricane or an earthquake.
- lostdog 5y agoLots of people think that grants aren't intended to fund tools, but are you sure that's the case? Particle accelerators are big tools, and the engineering is funded by grants. Ditto for telescopes. PyTorch allows thousands of labs to more efficiently do AI research, so should it have been fundable in some way?
- thunkshift1 5y agoThats called a startup with vc funding