3 ms·
You ain’t seen nothing yet. Facebook’s (sorry, Meta’s) VR, and then Neuralink, used to suck many people into virtual worlds and keep them “engaged” to feed the
by EGreg 5y ago
You ain’t seen nothing yet.
Facebook’s (sorry, Meta’s) VR, and then Neuralink, used to suck many people into virtual worlds and keep them “engaged” to feed the profit motive of the Wall St quarterly earnings (capitalism requires platforms to extract rents after all)
But why stop at the virtual world?
Ubiquitous cameras and wifi that can easily track everyone by their appearance, gait, heartbeat and other signatures etc. become commonplace.
Artificial intelligence with access to this info is used to predict all kinds of inconvenient gatherings and movements taking place and nip them in the bud, leading to precrime.
Deepfakes that make any sort of video evidence useless, while AI creates plausible “parallel construction” to win court cases against anyone
Drones become cheap to manufacture, and rogue drones can drop grenades anywhere without any way to figure out who launched them
Swarming autonomous slaughterbots that bring down the cost of eliminating anyone, first by governments, then by private actors.
Guns become cheap to 3d-print while replicating biological agents become cheap to release.
Bitcoin mining rewards make it more profitable to spend kilowatt-hours on using Proof of Work to secure those same 7 transactions per second than on air conditioning and brownouts regularly occur worldwide.
Think this is far-fetched or we can somehow solve these problems? How are we doing with the last few decades of problems:
the anthroposcene
ecological collapse
plummeting biodiversity
(insects, birds, tigers)
non-biodegradeable plastic
greenhouse gas effect
Humanity is like a young teenager that lives on a credit card, that future generations have to pay. We think we are so clever and so much smarter than previous generations, because we know the truth revealed by science. But we aren’t wise enough to use it sustainably.
At best, humanity is building a zoo for itself to be run by a benevolent AI, while the rest of the planet is turned into monocultures and factory farms.
At worst, the AI will not understand human needs and we’ll just all be frustrated all the time, or perhaps countries will just nuke the planet. Where is that nuclear clock?
- helloworld11 5y ago>Ubiquitous cameras and wifi that can easily track everyone by their appearance, gait, heartbeat and other signatures etc. become commonplace. >Deepfakes that make any sort of video evidence useless, while AI creates plausible “parallel construction” to win court cases against anyone I'd say that those two scenarios directly contradict each other in many ways.
- EGreg 5y agoYou’d be wrong. First of all, the cameras would have watermarks signed with private keys to authenticate the video so the deepfakes won’t matter. Secondly, no need to prove anything, in order to do the AI thing and precrime. And thirdly, when it comes to court cases, however you make arguments, the AI can help you make lots of plausible info for parallel construction.
- helloworld11 5y agoyou specifically mentioned cameras being everywhere for the sake of collecting evidence, and then right after spoke of deepfakes that make ANY camera footage subject to fakery. So whether what you say about watermarks and so forth is correct or not, based on your own words, I still see something of a contradiction.
- EGreg 5y ago"for the sake of collecting evidence" is your interpretation. I said: "Ubiquitous cameras and wifi that can easily track everyone by their appearance, gait, heartbeat and other signatures etc. become commonplace."