4 ms·
>You should be able and willing to think about what you would do with the given constraints. Should I? That's basically claiming that I should have an answer f
by Avshalom 5y ago
>You should be able and willing to think about what you would do with the given constraints.
Should I? That's basically claiming that I should have an answer for when I'm half way down any given slippery slope.
I would instead point out that (as a general matter and specifically in this case as the constraints bear no relation to reality) a slippery slope is a logical fallacy and I should no more be expected to have a pre-set contingency for every possible trolley problem than I should for waking up and finding out that 1+1=Banana.
- BugsJustFindMe 5y ago> Should I? If you care about the consistency of your framework, then yes, I believe so. > I would instead point out that (as a general matter and specifically in this case as the constraints bear no relation to reality) a slippery slope is a logical fallacy The presented scenarios are not any kind of slippery slope fallacy, so your statement is a non sequitur.