> manages to get within 5-15% of a traditional kernel for the things they measured. That is impressive. Top comment from the linked thread. This is a bit out

> manages to get within 5-15% of a traditional kernel for the things they measured. That is impressive. Top comment from the linked thread. This is a bit out of context. 5-15% in any measurements to mainstream software is too easy. Even if it's operating system. We all know that. This is why almost any papers that compare a research project's products with a mainstream production one in terms of performance is usually just for establishing context than actually comparison.