> Because if you do, but leave things of the table... [......] The point of the article is: "BTC POW bad because too much energy". So, author is allowed to disc

> Because if you do, but leave things of the table... [......] The point of the article is: "BTC POW bad because too much energy". So, author is allowed to discuss, bitcoin, energy, waste, other equivalent technologies, but I cannot bring up other industries which also waste energy and whose use is questionable? That's the sense or logic if you prefer.