4 ms·
PID 1 isn't particularly gigantic under systemd. Most actual work is delegated to other binaries. Eg, journald isn't PID 1. Personally, I take the opposite sta
by dale_glass 5y ago
PID 1 isn't particularly gigantic under systemd. Most actual work is delegated to other binaries. Eg, journald isn't PID 1.
Personally, I take the opposite stance. I have very little ideology besides things being open source. To me a machine is a tool to do a job, and if systemd does the job better, then that's the right tool, regardless of any violation of principles that it might involve. There's definitely good ideas in the Unix model, but if the model ceases to be useful, it's time to throw the bad parts out.
I also have no issues whatsoever with running Red Hat's Linux (I use Fedora). It does the job, it provides the tools I like, that's what matters.
- trasz 5y agoIt doesn’t matter if PID 1 isn’t gigantic if it depends on stuff that is.
- dale_glass 5y agoThere are legitimate concerns for PID 1 being small and stable, since if that doesn't work you have big issues. The rest doesn't really matter. They're separate processes and many are task specific and not used if you don't need that particular bit of functionality.