I don't refute the existence of social conventions, I disagree about where the line is. I thought we were arguing about where it lies, and whether this is compa

I don't refute the existence of social conventions, I disagree about where the line is. I thought we were arguing about where it lies, and whether this is comparable to theft and whether that is a breach of said social norms. Then you assume your own conclusion I use that to lecture me and call me names. This is just not how arguing works. You and I are obviously of a different mind, that does not prove that I'm wrong and that certainly does not mean you get to be this rude. I am sorry you didn't convince me. Now let's go our separate way, though I feel another Kafka trap is coming...