I'd be fine with a criticism of the proposal or general direction. Apparently you don't believe this would actually preserve any privacy. It would be interestin

I'd be fine with a criticism of the proposal or general direction. Apparently you don't believe this would actually preserve any privacy. It would be interesting to know why not. I understand the knee-jerk reaction. I agree that anything with Facebook's name associated with it is a huge red flag. And I get that there is some suspicion floating around about Mozilla's motives too, and it's easy for this to appear to be confirming the worst. But that's just gut level instinct. I'm curious about opinions about actual issues with the proposal. I personally believe that the intention here (on Mozilla's part, not Facebook's) is honorable.