Given that the warning is, as you say yourself, legally required, what do you consider to be the most likely primary reason for it being published? It being leg

Given that the warning is, as you say yourself, legally required, what do you consider to be the most likely primary reason for it being published? It being legally required (and the consequences of violating that), or "knowing journalists would see this"? Especially since this wasn't the first report where it was included...