4 ms·
> IL2: Sturmovik It is fully another sort of flight simulator. YSFlight core pros is that is almost "just polygonal flightsim", instead of "textured flight si
by app4soft 5y ago
> IL2: Sturmovik
It is fully another sort of flight simulator.
YSFlight core pros is that is almost "just polygonal flightsim", instead of "textured flight simulators" (such as IL2: Sturmovik, FlightGear, DCSWorld, MSFS, X-plane, etc.).
And, yes, YSFlight is fully capable for online gaming[0], and in part could be used with VR (with some tricks).
[0] https://forum.ysfhq.com/viewforum.php?f=301 https://forum.ysfhq.com/viewforum.php?f=301
[1] https://ysflight.org/serverlist/ https://ysflight.org/serverlist/
- meheleventyone 5y agoI wouldn't say that a minor aesthetic difference is all that important if you want to fly air-air and air-ground with a load of people. My suggestion to the parent is that there are other fun flight sims to fly about in and do similar things if they find YSFlight lacking at the moment.
- app4soft 5y ago> My suggestion to the parent is that there are other fun flight sims to fly about But this is thread about YSFlight, not about IL2: Sturmovik. You may create new thread to discuss your favorite flight sim.
- meheleventyone 5y agoThis is not how HN tends to work with discussions. The parent I originally replied to said what they liked about YSFlight but that they've since found multiplayer to be too quiet for them. I suggested an alternative which does what they seem to be interested in and has a more lively multiplayer population. You seem to be taking this as a slight on YSFlight which is not the intention and perhaps a bit overly defensive.
- runjake 5y agoThe irony here is that app4soft themselves bring up other flight simulators in this post discussion. Somehow, in their logic, it's okay for them, but not you.
- app4soft 5y agoThe irony is that I'm telling about open-source software flight simulators[0] and comparing them to YSFlight (which is partially open-source) from point of software. Where 'meheleventyone' droped IL2:Sturmovik in actual thread just as "alternative game to play" — there is nothing about its software development described here and IL2:Sturmovik is not in whole or even in part open-source app.[1] Lets not manipulate in the middle here. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30299850#30302334 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30299850#30302334 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30299850#30301295 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30299850#30301295
- app4soft 5y ago> This is not how HN tends to work with discussions. Of course no, but I'm really not seeing any relation between YSFlight and IL2:Sturmovik, except both are in "flight simulators" category — those two software are totally different, from hackers point of view. Also, YSFlight is freeware & partially open-source personal/hobby project, IL2 instead is a commercial product made by big company with a lot of devs specially for selling and marketing.
- meheleventyone 5y agoThe relationship to the discussion I've pointed out twice to you. Let's hope a third time helps: > The parent I originally replied to said what they liked about YSFlight but that they've since found multiplayer to be too quiet for them. I suggested an alternative which does what they seem to be interested in and has a more lively multiplayer population.
- app4soft 5y ago> This is not how HN tends to work with discussions. To be clear, I posted YSFlight on HN to look on it from software developer point of view — not as a game suggestion. That is Hacker News, not a Game Wiki.
- throwaway675309 5y agoFor crying out loud, since you seem to be being willfully obtuse on this, he suggested a game with a thriving multiplayer experience which is where the original poster found this particular game to be lacking.
- jamiek88 5y ago