4 ms·
Can you please explicate your last point? I don't know about first two but S3 or CloudFront is from Amazon which certainly have too many blemishes. Also, AFAIK
by cute_boi 5y ago
Can you please explicate your last point?
I don't know about first two but S3 or CloudFront is from Amazon which certainly have too many blemishes. Also, AFAIK Cloudflare is an infrastructure provider so, I wonder why would ethics come here.
Are we going to blame Google for making a browser that is used for hundreds of immoral things?
The only reason I think one will disdain over Cloudflare is due to monopoly. And, many argue they do some DDOS attack, but I have never seen any modicum of evidence.
- viraptor 5y agoThey will go to the court to prevent revealing the identity and suing people who run websites organising persistent harassment, then keep hosting the website with that knowledge, like here: https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/1485731083534667779 https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/1485731083534667779 (CW and all that) Google browser is not in the same situation because the abusers are not direct, paying customers of Google and Google is not fighting to both keep them and hide their identity. I understand why CF would want to keep their privacy position. But once they know about the abuse and don't drop those customers - they support the abuse.