5 ms·
US folks who are interested in writing their Senators can find information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm?OrderBy%253Dstate%2526Sort%25
by jimhefferon 5y ago
US folks who are interested in writing their Senators can find information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm?OrderBy%253Dstate%2526Sort%253DASC https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm?OrderBy...
FWIW, I sent the email below (largely cribbed from the EFF).
Dear :
I am a constituent. I urge you to oppose the EARN IT act, S.3538. It does not strike a reasonable balance between fighting crimes and the rights of users to privacy and encryption.
The bill empowers every state or territory to create sweeping new Internet regulations, by stripping away the legal protections for websites and apps in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. The states will be allowed to pass whatever law they want to hold private companies liable, as long as they somehow relate their new rules to online child abuse.
The bill’s sponsors have stated that EARN IT will pressure Internet companies to do widespread scanning of user messages and photos. This scanning is incompatible with strong encryption. Consequently, the act allows states to pass laws that will punish companies when they deploy end-to-end encryption, or offer other encrypted services. This includes messaging services like WhatsApp, Signal, and iMessage, as well as web hosts like Amazon Web Services.
The sponsors have falsely claimed that the act would protect children. But abusive images are already highly illegal under federal law. Any Internet platforms that knows about child sexual abuse material being distributed or received are required to take action on it, and can be severely prosecuted if they do not.
EARN IT would lead to penalties for people and companies that use encryption. The harm done by this will fall on vulnerable people. Once we allow encryption to be compromised in order to scan for one thing, authoritarian regimes will demand the same capabilities to track information shared by activists and journalists. Another example is that people subject to domestic abuse, including children, won’t have secure channels of communication to report and reach out for trusted help.
Once again, I urge you to oppose the EARN IT act.
Thank you,
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- atlantas 5y agoNot only urge them to oppose it, but make it clear that it's a dealbreaker. I will vote you out if you support this bill. End of story.
- BitwiseFool 5y ago>"I will vote you out if you support this bill. End of story. " I wish this threat would work on Senators who don't represent purple states. Come hell or high water, my home state will re-elect the same Democrats until the day they die or retire. Edit: Yes, we can try to vote for a different Democrat in the primary but that rarely ever succeeds, especially against a tenured incumbent. I wish there was a runoff system so the vote isn't split amongst ~6 competitors and the incumbent.
- tekknik 5y agoYou can also vote for a republican or independent. You complain about people re-electing dems but you suffer from the same issue it seems.
- colinmhayes 5y agoThis threat is utterly empty in most states.
- CRConrad 5y ago> The states will be allowed to pass whatever law they want to hold private companies liable, as long as they somehow relate their new rules to online child abuse. Ah, so child abuse is kind of the new interstate commerce, only for states in stead of the feds?