Two keys here I think. One is the way the team was built. The people selected had truly remarkable skills in their own domains such that everyone already had th

Two keys here I think. One is the way the team was built. The people selected had truly remarkable skills in their own domains such that everyone already had the respect of others. There was nothing to prove in part because the team fit together so well. Big credit should go to the person or people who selected the team. Second is the chairman facilitating who didn't controlled the conversation, didn't leave time for bullshit, and probably had a very tight agenda.