> the gov or court was never a part of ATC union negotiation the gov was the other party > explicitly legal, defined, upheld in courts no it wasn't - not be

> the gov or court was never a part of ATC union negotiation the gov was the other party > explicitly legal, defined, upheld in courts no it wasn't - not be a long shot. this was why it was declared illegal. ATC controllers are legally NOT allowed to strike. > gov dont need any base to dissolve(formally - discertify) any union organization? an illegal strike is more than a basis, it's a guarantee.