3 ms·
>it's hard to explain the pattern observed in terms of the pre-K program itself; What's so hard to explain? The article points out that the poor kids got drill
by perilunar 5y ago
>it's hard to explain the pattern observed in terms of the pre-K program itself;
What's so hard to explain? The article points out that the poor kids got drilling, worksheets and lectures, while wealthy kids get play-based programs. The results are no surprise to me at all. Young kids need play, not teaching.
- skyde 5y agoHow do you know explain your conclusion? If you are correct and teaching young kid didn’t work it would be a waste of time but not make the kid grade worse or better. if young kid need to play wouldn’t the kid that played get better grade in grade 1?