3 ms·
> there's presumably little/no acquisition value in the eyes of the NYT without this tracking. I pay their $4.99/month subscription for access to their "Games"
by shbooms 5y ago
> there's presumably little/no acquisition value in the eyes of the NYT without this tracking.
I pay their $4.99/month subscription for access to their "Games" package solely because it includes access to their full archive of daily crosswords (going back to 1993).
If they add a similar "archive" of the daily Wordles and allow payed users to replay past puzzles, that could presumably provide new value to them by enticing more paying customers.
- gnicholas 5y agoFYI, there's already an archive that's free to use. [1] Although it shows basic stats, I was surprised that it doesn't show stats on how many guesses you took. 1: https://metzger.media/games/wordle-archive https://metzger.media/games/wordle-archive
- nefitty 5y agoThanks. This is the first time I've tried it. I have no idea what the rules are. Oh well.