The main point of the articles seems to be that we should examine if things need to be done. Many of our tasks nowadays falls into the category of seeming to be

The main point of the articles seems to be that we should examine if things need to be done. Many of our tasks nowadays falls into the category of seeming to be very important (but aren't) and has strict deadlines (not really). All of the examples that the author gave just show that the tasks we think are really important or urgent, are not. In fact, perhaps what might help the most is using an Eisenhower Matrix and taking the time to categorize the tasks on hand. Another thing I noticed is the example of writing the essay for the volume of Philosophy. It's true that he was stressing over nothing as everyone else was late but wouldn't it be better if he didn't have to worry about it all this time. Perhaps the best way to handle procrastination is to just do the "actual" important and urgent tasks early in the day so that you can do w.e tasks you want later. Also take more breaks. The author himself takes a break when he goes to the dorms and chills with the student. (although he mentions it as procrastination) Maybe we just need to face the truth that we aren't superhuman. We have a finite amount of resources at our disposal including time, energy, effort (physical or mental) and emotions. We need to rest and recharge. Essentially, it's important to ruthlessly prioritize and frequently take breaks.