3 ms·

This would be more impactful if 3/4 of the world wasn't already at "Level 4: Do Not Travel". As it is, it signals that Ukraine is as dangerous as such countrie

by 0x7E3 5y ago

This would be more impactful if 3/4 of the world wasn't already at "Level 4: Do Not Travel". As it is, it signals that Ukraine is as dangerous as such countries as Australia, Canada, France, The United Kingdom, Norway, and Sweden each of which is also listed as Do Not Travel. You will definitely me much saver traveling to Libya, Mexico, Pakistan, or Madagascar (Level 2: Reconsider Travel) than to any of those places... As much as I would like for them to be, I'm not sure that Department of State travel advisories are a useful indicator of traveler safety at this time. To be clear, I'm not saying this warning isn't serious, just that the system has been abused to the point it's harder to signal urgency.

jker 5y ago
Those level 4 warnings are all about COVID. The Ukraine one is for COVID but also the strong possibility of Russian tank shells.
- 0x7E3 5y ago
  I edited my comment to be more clear. I'm not saying that it isn't dangerous. I'm saying that the 'levels' system seems to be broken. When "imminent danger of becoming an active war zone" is at the same level as "health risks similar to traveling domestically" the 'levels' no longer communicate much of use.