3 ms·
> because people don't know how to do it efficiently Of course we do. We just choose not to bother because delivering features efficiently is often more valua
by threeseed 5y ago
> because people don't know how to do it efficiently
Of course we do.
We just choose not to bother because delivering features efficiently is often more valuable than shaving off a few seconds of download time. Especially when it's typically once off and then cached.
- austincheney 5y ago> Of course we do. Apparently not. A few seconds is a really big deal, but that is just download time while you are also clearly not accounting for execution time. Caching code will not save on execution time.
- threeseed 5y agoThere are always edge cases e.g. running Amazon. But in most cases execution time is negligible and a few seconds isn't a big deal compared to having more features.
- austincheney 5y agoIf it takes seconds to execute more features you are doing it extremely wrong.