3 ms·
I don't think it does. They cite table 21 for this analysis: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41591-022-01689-3/MediaObjects/41591_2022_
by cantspeakmind85 5y ago
I don't think it does. They cite table 21 for this analysis: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41591-022-01689-3/MediaObjects/41591_2022_1689_MOESM1_ESM.pdf https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs415...
If you read their footnotes, they say:
"In total, 95,223 (61.93%) participants in COVID-19 group received COVID-19 vaccine (42,065 (44.18%), 45,450 (47.73%) and 7708 (8.09%) received BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and Ad26.COV2.S, respectively) and 3,173,169 (56.29%) participants in contemporary group received COVID-19 vaccine (1,349,844 (42.54%), 1,609,399 (50.72%) and 213,926 (6.74%) received BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and Ad26.COV2.S, respectively) before end of follow up."
So it looks like both the COVID-19 group and contemporary group had received the covid vaccine.
- ceejayoz 5y agoWhat part of "61.93% [of] participants ... received COVID-19 vaccine" is confusing to you? Both the "got COVID" and the "didn't get COVID" ("contemporary control") group had some people vaccinated and some not. They can slice and dice the data based on vaccination status; they clearly have the info.