Is this the usual 'they're a company' argument? The thing is, even though they're a company, they still have an obligation to the public through virtue of the l

Is this the usual 'they're a company' argument? The thing is, even though they're a company, they still have an obligation to the public through virtue of the law. Do you really agree with them shutting off a creator's revenue stream simply because they have a prosthetic leg?