Stallman is a symptom of a much larger problem with the FSF, and not because he's a creep. (well, also, because it drove contributors away, but that's aside the

Stallman is a symptom of a much larger problem with the FSF, and not because he's a creep. (well, also, because it drove contributors away, but that's aside the point) The FSF is irrelevant in discussions about FOSS, because they are absolutely unwilling to compromise. They purport to being a movement, but they do everything in their power to stay as small and elitist as possible. Like recommending extremely niche distros that will provide a bad experience on 99% of computers you run it on (and insecure on 100%). So there are plenty of reasons to write this article that have nothing to do with RMS. We could've had effective software freedom advocacy, but all we got was elitist entitled bickering about how everyone else is unethical and interviews full of FSF spokespeople nitpicking to a degree most people will roll their eyes and move on immediately. I guess that's mostly RMS, and he simply doesn't have the charisma to pull it off well.