3 ms·
I like Nukemap, however the problem is that there is no way to have multiple target sites. Having a visualization of one target site is useful but if it was a
by mothsonasloth 5y ago
I like Nukemap, however the problem is that there is no way to have multiple target sites.
Having a visualization of one target site is useful but if it was a full nuclear strike lots of targets would be hit by smaller yielded weapons (I am not an expert).
Industry, Military Bases, Infrastructure and Communications
AFAIK population centers are secondary targets in a first strike, however in a MAD (mutually assured destruction scenario) everything would be a target, right?
example targets for UK
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/06/article-2650518-1E8609FB00000578-134_634x758.jpg https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/06/06/article-2650518-1...
- djcapelis 5y agoLike this? https://www.nuclearwarmap.com/ https://www.nuclearwarmap.com/
- moffkalast 5y agoWhen Colorado is nuked so badly that only Color remains hah. https://i.imgur.com/yvsPBak.png https://i.imgur.com/yvsPBak.png
- monocasa 5y agoPutting NORAD in a mountain to protect it from nukes is a problem solved by more nukes it seems.
- arethuza 5y agoI think that's a pretty old map. Pretty sure the target to the North West of Edinburgh is the Pitreavie Castle site that was closed in '96 and is now housing. The UK also hasn't had strategic bombers for a long time either!