5 ms·
> it would remove the whole, making it indistinguishable from what you would think should be behind the hole There is no algorithm in existence or will ever be
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
> it would remove the whole, making it indistinguishable from what you would think should be behind the hole
There is no algorithm in existence or will ever be discovered in our lifetimes that could cover those black holes with enough accuracy, or creativity, to make it indistinguishable from the real thing.
- random314 5y agoThe training data for such a neural network is extremely easy to generate. Combine it with a GAN, and Demis Hassabis will get it working in 5 years - if you can get him interested. https://www.whichfaceisreal.com/methods.html https://www.whichfaceisreal.com/methods.html
- Ma8ee 5y agoI'd say that Lightroom already today does quite impressively, and I'm certain that there are specialised software that does even better.
- oneeyedpigeon 5y agoNot even if it's supplied other images from the same location, potentially at the exact same time period?
- gruez 5y agoThat will get you a "best guess", not necessarily what was actually captured. It'll be the same if you told a historian + artist to draw in the blanks.
- GaggiX 5y agoLaMa give you already pretty robust result. https://github.com/saic-mdal/lama https://github.com/saic-mdal/lama Certainly neural networks capable enough to perform this task in our lifetime will be developed.