The WSJ has churned out at least three op-eds in the past two months on the theme that 1/6 shouldn't be called an "insurrection". It makes you wonder what benef

The WSJ has churned out at least three op-eds in the past two months on the theme that 1/6 shouldn't be called an "insurrection". It makes you wonder what benefit a pro-business conservative outlet with an upper class readership sees in encouraging populist riots. If they think any of this unrest, or keeping 1/6 alive as an issue, or justifying a mob is good for the GOP, they're nuts.