If I build a gun mount, that uses a basic computer vision algorithm to identify people out a window. It then randomly select a target - “true” random so no clai

If I build a gun mount, that uses a basic computer vision algorithm to identify people out a window. It then randomly select a target - “true” random so no claims I set a seed - and then shoots them. Do you think there is an argument that I should not be responsible? If “random” is too independent, or you want it to be systematic, we could do something else: * the person with the highest “red hat” score according to a 20 year old copy of opencv Or we could do something modern and “AI” and give it a completely random neural net that’s super deep and has three outputs: angle, pitch, and whether to pull the trigger. Or we could go all out and just replace this hypothetical machine that acts like an independent person with the next best thing: a regular human. If a government, or a terrorist group, gives a group of people (or soldiers) a bunch of weapons and drops them off in a city, and they start shooting, do you think that the government would be responsible?