When the question being asked is "Why do people want to ban FSD from roads", and on an article about unsafe activities from the vehicle, I'd expect that the dis

When the question being asked is "Why do people want to ban FSD from roads", and on an article about unsafe activities from the vehicle, I'd expect that the discussion centers around the technology and implication. In your answer, yes, you do address those things, but (with apologies if that's sincerely not your intent) those are lightly brushed off with a "but people kill in cars, too". What is not brushed off, and is the first response you have, is entirely about people who have a vested financial interest in the failure of FSD, Tesla, Musk, or some combination of the above. And that's the only response you don't brush off with a "well, but". For but one example, in our marketplace, for better or worse, short selling is an entirely valid tool (though I'm not particularly a fan, and don't even start me on naked short selling). So given that it's the first response you have, and it's a common refrain, "oh, people just want to see it fail", then it's not necessarily unexpected that I might express frustration at the discussion not paying much mind to the technology itself. But as said, if that's not really your intent, my sincere apologies.