I gather that you didn't look at your employers Glassdoor reviews until after you left? I'm really confused about your apparent conflict with having quit a tox

I gather that you didn't look at your employers Glassdoor reviews until after you left? I'm really confused about your apparent conflict with having quit a toxic employer. Remaining only enables the a##holds to survive by pointing at nice guys like you. So being conflicted about leaving is likely down to the similar kind of human collective survival instinct kicking in that kept the 3rd Reich functioning until the organisational Medusa was finally beheaded. Surveys like Glassdoor probably (in my hand wavy land of concrete civic ethical computability probably proven, but it does seem necessary to appeal to more than one kind of human evaluation to break chains like these) only contribute to the problem by giving antisocial and anethical CEOs sources for deriving operating limits that I suspect wouldn't work if more good folk such as yourself heeded Glassdoor information prior to accepting employment instead of maintaining a impossible to calibrate open book according to our individual experiences, which we then go right ahead and discount for being outliers based on our total presumptuous imagination that the obscenity of a organisation we're suffering from is actually quite good and normal because obviously we started giving the boss a neutral score because that's what fair unbiased scientific folk do. That's exactly what fair unbiased scientific folk do also with great results, only every other situation where we apply our fair logic we're using wildly capable arrays of the most sophisticated linearized SI / ANSI calibrated measuring equipment that leverage chains of custody for reference and operating systems maximising the cumulative learning of mankind and human ability to reject misleading but tempting fallacies for fair fact.