> But medical research leads to treatments which may have far better quality of life improvements than ramps. There is so much wrong with what you say. Just lo

> But medical research leads to treatments which may have far better quality of life improvements than ramps. There is so much wrong with what you say. Just look at the person in the very article. He doesn't walk with a hippity-hoppity bouncy gait. He walks with the help of a wheeled walking frame. He needs the ramps and the handholds to get to places. Do you have a proposal on how to spend all the ramp money to "medical research" that away? Look at any person who broke their leg and walks with a crutch, or a mother-to-be who is wobbly from all the extra weight of the baby, or an old person who needs a walking frame. Do you think if we just spend more money on medical research these conditions will go away? How are you proposing to medical research away the need for a baby stroller?