4 ms·

Is this supposed to be a gotcha? It doesn't change anything from what I said. I didn't say I think he's guilty of transporting a weapon. I said I think he's gui

• vel0city 5y ago
  A minor taking a gun like that across state lines would have been a crime which you stated he committed by looking at a video. In reality, he didn't commit the crime of trafficking the firearm across state lines as a minor. You even stated "if you look at the evidence, the fact is that he took a gun across state lines..." which is not backed by the evidence, you just jumped to a conclusion that it was a fact and even worse repeated that it was a fact despite zero evidence and against sworn testimony in the case. > 2OEH8eoCRo0: > My experience was that people did not look at the evidence- they jumped to a conclusion. You didn't look at the evidence, you jumped to a conclusion which is not based in fact, and broadcasted that you did this in your message. Thus proving 2OHEH8eoCRo0's point: people assume things about the case without looking at the facts. > I didn't say I think he's guilty of transporting a weapon You 100% did claim this when you said "the fact is that he took a gun across state lines".