A quantitative approach is no virtue here, just a more convincing way to lie. ITER will use roughly the same amount of power as JET, produce 10x the power 40 y

A quantitative approach is no virtue here, just a more convincing way to lie. ITER will use roughly the same amount of power as JET, produce 10x the power 40 years later. Even using poor metrics such as Q you have enough data points to p-hack whatever incorrect timeframe model you want. ITER isn't even using HTS coils. If you really want a quantitative projection of MCF performance over time, here you go. Don't lie with numbers if you don't know what you're talking about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fustion_triple-product_diagram_Horvath.webp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fustion_triple-product_di...