I think the notion that a company such as HP could be led by someone who is not irrefutably passionate about technology is flawed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

I think the notion that a company such as HP could be led by someone who is not irrefutably passionate about technology is flawed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meg_Whitman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meg_Whitman Nothing about her bio suggests any sincere interest in technology. I think this line is interesting "She believed the site to be confusing and began by building a new executive team.", and indicative of how she could bring a new level of suck to HP. "Whitman organized the company by splitting it into twenty-three business categories. She then assigned executives to each, including some 35,000 subcategories." I might short HP.