A lot of people seem to have missed the point I was trying to make. I'm not saying that it's unusual for Google to engage in anti-competitive dumping or kill th

A lot of people seem to have missed the point I was trying to make. I'm not saying that it's unusual for Google to engage in anti-competitive dumping or kill their products; I'm wondering why so many of these actions were timed so close to each other. As it stands, the narrative around Google dumping is more blatantly clear than if they waited longer to phase out some other products (like storage for Universities) or simply didn't, which makes me think that internal or external pressure on Google to monetise its properties more aggressively is ramping up.