3 ms·
You may be happy to learn that a lot of recent stem cell work does not actually use foetal tissue. Instead, there are methods for reverting adult cells from a b
by mattkrause 5y ago
You may be happy to learn that a lot of recent stem cell work does not actually use foetal tissue. Instead, there are methods for reverting adult cells from a blood sample back into stem cells (IPSCs, or induced pluripotent stem cells). This is exciting for a number of reasons: not only does it sidestep ethical concerns, but it introduces the possibility of making stem cells--and thus, other cells--that precisely match an individual patient!
On the other hand, I'd encourage you to think about the motivations of medical researchers. Nobody is actually looking for any excuse to work with embryonic tissues (or animals, placebo-controlled trials, etc): it's slow, annoying and expensive and everyone I've ever met would vastly prefer to use yeast + computational models. People do actually want to help the sick and helpless, but the tools aren't there yet to do so with nothing but yeast and computational models.
- verisimi 5y agoOk - things change. It was an similar example of the point is that with articles like these we are being 'tenderised' into acceptance of the generally unacceptable. It is a type of manipulative engineering of consent. It is not a fair presentation of the issue. The 'sales job' suggests there is a (degenerative) agenda already in play with a desired end.
- mattkrause 5y agoI'm honestly baffled as to what might be the generally unacceptable or "degenerative" agenda here. They stuck needles into consenting volunteers' spines and injected current. I don't think there's like...a big conspiracy to convince people to get epidurals or something.