> [citation needed] The poster you replied to may have been thinking of US court decisions related to the legality of politicians blocking members of the publi

> [citation needed] The poster you replied to may have been thinking of US court decisions related to the legality of politicians blocking members of the public, when those politicians are speaking in their official capacity [1][2]. That doesn't quite seem to be the same thing as "the public has a right to access official government communications on social media". [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_First_Amendment_Institute_v._Trump https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight_First_Amendment_Institu... [2] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/02/can-government-officials-block-you-social-media-new-decision-makes-law-murkier https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/02/can-government-officia...