5 ms·

Nobody I know gives a shit that it's not E2E encrypted. It's a kick ass instant messenger, that's all that matters to most people. Vastly superior to Signal and

Nobody I know gives a shit that it's not E2E encrypted. It's a kick ass instant messenger, that's all that matters to most people. Vastly superior to Signal and others in almost every way.

vinay427 5y ago
Sure, but it’s for some reason framed as a WhatsApp competitor even in countries where Facebook Messenger is relatively popular, which seems silly to me. It appears to fill a similar feature niche as Facebook Messenger, not WhatsApp, even if these two categories can be somewhat conflated for most uses.
- gonehome 5y ago
  Yeah, the irony is they position themselves as 'anti-facebook' and they're worse for the user than FB's whatsapp product from a security standpoint. I'd probably even trust FB's unencrypted messenger content to be better protected than telegram. They clearly have a loyal fan following though.
  - skinkestek 5y ago
    I absolutely don't recommend using Telegram for sensitive communications. That said, this idea > I'd probably even trust FB's unencrypted messenger content to be better protected than telegram. is ridiculous. With Facebook you know you will be datamined and the result sold to anyone who wants to buy.. With Telegram maybe Putin reads it, maybe not. One of them is a threat to my family and friends, the other is not.
    - gonehome 5y ago
      FB doesn't sell the data, they sell the ability for advertisers to advertise to groups. I'm not a fan of ad-driven models, but this is a lot different than selling data. If you're using unencrypted messaging you should assume it's public. This is true of FB messenger and Telegram, but if I had to bet on what unencrypted content is more likely to be owned I'd bet on Telegram. This is mostly a bet on where the world's best security people are and the company culture. Really though we shouldn't be relying on the benevolence of any of these company leaders, that's why people should use Signal or WhatsApp where the encryption means you don't have to (or Urbit where there is no central leader).
    - thePostFuturist 5y ago
      Telegram, specifically P. Durov has literally sponsored Russian dissidents. He refused to give over info when he still ran VK over to the FSB instead sending them literally memes. When Telegram was banned in Russia, he spun up free proxies for people to bypass the restrictions. In short - you’re posting misinformation.
      - skinkestek 5y ago
        That is not intentional. My point is not that Durov sends data to Putin (I don't think he does). My point is that there is a lot we don't know about Telegram. When it comes to WhatsApp and all other Facebook properties we know a lot and much of what we know is ugly. But yes, I should find a better way to phrase it.
        thePostFuturist 5y ago
        What a civilized response. I don’t know if this is the norm on HN, but this is incredibly constructive compared to the reddit or twitter doubling down for any stance. Cheers.
      - gonehome 5y ago
        From this article it sounds like he probably did give info over to the FSB when running VK after he got spooked. Though at least it does sound like after that he made changes to get out of the country so he could be more independent.
        thePostFuturist 5y ago
        VK =/= Telegram. At this point the FSB has free reign on key requests from VK — it’s owned in majority by Usmanov, who has strong connections to the Kremlin. But in the article it says that he made that clear in his remarks as well when he was ousted.
        gonehome 5y ago
        Yeah I know VK != Telegram, but in the article when he was running VK it sounded like he got scared and handed over a lot of personal user details to the government. It also sounded like with Telegram there was some abuse of looking up or deleting other employees chats when threatened. The culture of the company doesn’t seem great. All of this is kind of irrelevant though. The core issue is unencrypted chats.
goblin89 5y ago
If your friends don’t care but you do, educate them. The good old “I’ve got nothing to hide” is de-facto a synonym of self-censorship or recklessness due to lack of awareness.
Gigachad 5y ago
There are like 1000 features in telegram that just don’t work properly for e2e chats as well. When I use e2e messengers they cut so many features for security. Matrix doesn’t show link previews when e2e is on for example.
- feanaro 5y ago
  I think you mean Element doesn't show previews when E2EE is on. This is not a fundamental limitation but a default setting in order to preserve privacy. You can easily turn URL previews for a given E2EE room on by going to the room settings > General > scroll down to Other > URL Previews.

Nobody I know gives a shit that it's not E2E encrypted. It's a kick ass instant messenger, that's all that matters to most people. Vastly superior to Signal and others in almost every way.

vinay427 5y ago

Sure, but it’s for some reason framed as a WhatsApp competitor even in countries where Facebook Messenger is relatively popular, which seems silly to me. It appears to fill a similar feature niche as Facebook Messenger, not WhatsApp, even if these two categories can be somewhat conflated for most uses.

gonehome 5y ago
Yeah, the irony is they position themselves as 'anti-facebook' and they're worse for the user than FB's whatsapp product from a security standpoint. I'd probably even trust FB's unencrypted messenger content to be better protected than telegram. They clearly have a loyal fan following though.
- skinkestek 5y ago
  I absolutely don't recommend using Telegram for sensitive communications. That said, this idea > I'd probably even trust FB's unencrypted messenger content to be better protected than telegram. is ridiculous. With Facebook you know you will be datamined and the result sold to anyone who wants to buy.. With Telegram maybe Putin reads it, maybe not. One of them is a threat to my family and friends, the other is not.
  - gonehome 5y ago
    FB doesn't sell the data, they sell the ability for advertisers to advertise to groups. I'm not a fan of ad-driven models, but this is a lot different than selling data. If you're using unencrypted messaging you should assume it's public. This is true of FB messenger and Telegram, but if I had to bet on what unencrypted content is more likely to be owned I'd bet on Telegram. This is mostly a bet on where the world's best security people are and the company culture. Really though we shouldn't be relying on the benevolence of any of these company leaders, that's why people should use Signal or WhatsApp where the encryption means you don't have to (or Urbit where there is no central leader).
  - thePostFuturist 5y ago
    Telegram, specifically P. Durov has literally sponsored Russian dissidents. He refused to give over info when he still ran VK over to the FSB instead sending them literally memes. When Telegram was banned in Russia, he spun up free proxies for people to bypass the restrictions. In short - you’re posting misinformation.
    - skinkestek 5y ago
      That is not intentional. My point is not that Durov sends data to Putin (I don't think he does). My point is that there is a lot we don't know about Telegram. When it comes to WhatsApp and all other Facebook properties we know a lot and much of what we know is ugly. But yes, I should find a better way to phrase it.
      - thePostFuturist 5y ago
        What a civilized response. I don’t know if this is the norm on HN, but this is incredibly constructive compared to the reddit or twitter doubling down for any stance. Cheers.
    - gonehome 5y ago
      From this article it sounds like he probably did give info over to the FSB when running VK after he got spooked. Though at least it does sound like after that he made changes to get out of the country so he could be more independent.
      - thePostFuturist 5y ago
        VK =/= Telegram. At this point the FSB has free reign on key requests from VK — it’s owned in majority by Usmanov, who has strong connections to the Kremlin. But in the article it says that he made that clear in his remarks as well when he was ousted.
        gonehome 5y ago
        Yeah I know VK != Telegram, but in the article when he was running VK it sounded like he got scared and handed over a lot of personal user details to the government. It also sounded like with Telegram there was some abuse of looking up or deleting other employees chats when threatened. The culture of the company doesn’t seem great. All of this is kind of irrelevant though. The core issue is unencrypted chats.

goblin89 5y ago

If your friends don’t care but you do, educate them. The good old “I’ve got nothing to hide” is de-facto a synonym of self-censorship or recklessness due to lack of awareness.

Gigachad 5y ago

There are like 1000 features in telegram that just don’t work properly for e2e chats as well. When I use e2e messengers they cut so many features for security. Matrix doesn’t show link previews when e2e is on for example.

feanaro 5y ago
I think you mean Element doesn't show previews when E2EE is on. This is not a fundamental limitation but a default setting in order to preserve privacy. You can easily turn URL previews for a given E2EE room on by going to the room settings > General > scroll down to Other > URL Previews.