4 ms·
Based on Tesla’s history with FSD, I don’t think giving any Musk company the benefit of the doubt is warranted. There are two options: 1) They don’t monitor t
by ABeeSea 5y ago
Based on Tesla’s history with FSD, I don’t think giving any Musk company the benefit of the doubt is warranted.
There are two options:
1) They don’t monitor the warnings.
2) The warning doesn’t matter. Move fast and breaking things.
Both options are bad.
- macintux 5y ago3) The warning was missed due to <fill in the blank process failure> 4) The severity of the situation was misjudged 5) They decided to try a real-world experiment to determine whether their expectations were correct
- quartesixte 5y agoI suspect some combination of 4 and 5. Seeing how the satellites were taken down not by the storm itself but the atmosphere slightly expanding to make the low-orbit to high-orbit move physically impossible, I wonder if this is something that hadn’t been encountered before, or is a known phenomenon but with unknown consequences. Known phenomenon with unknown consequences tends to be the kind of stuff SpaceX likes to hurl headfirst into to see what breaks.
- elisharobinson 5y ago