>It must be a good feeling, then, that I have not criticized them. You were trying to correct someone who was defending the accuracy of the general industry pr

>It must be a good feeling, then, that I have not criticized them. You were trying to correct someone who was defending the accuracy of the general industry predictions. If you were not directly criticizing 538, the criticism was certainly implied. >> Is this "misinformation" meant to smear 538? Are you familiar with the concept of scare quotes? I specifically used quotes there to indicate that I was not directly calling your comment misinformation but was instead using that term with some detachment.