3 ms·
> Similarly it doesn't make sense to criticize 538 for being less accurate with their early projections when they had less information It must be a good feelin
by lelandfe 5y ago
> Similarly it doesn't make sense to criticize 538 for being less accurate with their early projections when they had less information
It must be a good feeling, then, that I have not criticized them.
> to be clear I didn't call your comment misinformation
Earlier:
> Is this "misinformation" meant to smear 538?
- slg 5y ago>It must be a good feeling, then, that I have not criticized them. You were trying to correct someone who was defending the accuracy of the general industry predictions. If you were not directly criticizing 538, the criticism was certainly implied. >> Is this "misinformation" meant to smear 538? Are you familiar with the concept of scare quotes? I specifically used quotes there to indicate that I was not directly calling your comment misinformation but was instead using that term with some detachment.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]