4 ms·
Edited. And fair enough point. To use your analogy, this question is more of the "linguist" side. If I were solely interesting in the "writer" side, I would b
by blueslurpee 5y ago
Edited.
And fair enough point. To use your analogy, this question is more of the "linguist" side.
If I were solely interesting in the "writer" side, I would be building distributed systems in Go.
- eternalban 5y agoIn that case, something like Prolog would definitely be a change and possibly a lot of fun to explore but I have no idea about the community. I also liked Chapel [1] a lot when I looked at a couple of years ago (again modulo community). If you are into distributed systems TLA+ could be a nice thing to know though obviously it's not a general purpose language. [1]: https://chapel-lang.org/ https://chapel-lang.org/
- bradcray 5y ago@blueslurpee: I'm definitely biased, but agree that Chapel would be a fun language to explore, particularly if you're interested in looking at integrated task- and data-parallelism within a language or distributed computing with a partitioned global namespace. If you do, feel free to reach out with questions/comments/requests on Stack Overflow, Discourse, GitHub, Gitter, etc. [1] -Brad [1]: https://chapel-lang.org/community.html https://chapel-lang.org/community.html
- eternalban 5y agoI have a question for you Brad (hope you see this): How would you characterize the suitability of Chapel for (what is being called) ML-Ops both in terms of work distribution (something like 'Ray' etc.) and interop with ML/GPU libraries and frameworks?