4 ms·
Yes. Yes. Yes. To the point where I've almost tried to copy some HackerNews source code and complete a POC myself. Others have commented that this feature alre
by ralston3 5y ago
Yes. Yes. Yes. To the point where I've almost tried to copy some HackerNews source code and complete a POC myself.
Others have commented that this feature already exists. And yes "technically" it may exist, but I'm guessing that you mean "by default". I absolutely agree that I should be able to set collapsible threads as the default.
It never fails on HN, that on some topic, the first/top comment and its replies span the _entire_ page! That's terrible UX! We want to see what other people have to say.
As a user/reader, let me dig into conversations/threads that I find interesting without having to scroll through pages and pages. Who's to say there aren't more interesting discussions buried underneath the top comment thread? Dang always has to post reminders saying to "not forget these pages of comments". If we had a collapsible thread, I believe he wouldn't have to do that as much.
This could be implemented with little-to-no fancy JS/whatever -- so that HackerNews remains as barebones as it is. Even better - if you let users choose whether or not they want the collapsible comments feature by using a setting on the user profile view. Everyone wins :)
- detaro 5y ago... what exactly are you missing from the existing implementation? you click the [-] and the thread is collapsed, what else do you want?
- anyfoo 5y agoYeah, I'm also getting confused. Collapsible threads are enabled by defaults, unless I'm missing something. Maybe it's now about collapsed by default, i.e. you have to expand any comment thread you want to read?
- ralston3 5y ago> ... be able to set collapsible threads as the default HN has collapsible threads...they are not collapsed by default...
- detaro 5y agook, yeah, but they are collapsible by default, just not collapsed, that what confused me with that statement :D