4 ms·
> Still think MacOS is crap overall though. Soon as linux is viable on M1 as a daily driver, i am checking out of macos. This is a weird position to hold. You
by pdpi 5y ago
> Still think MacOS is crap overall though. Soon as linux is viable on M1 as a daily driver, i am checking out of macos.
This is a weird position to hold. You just argued why macOS does some fundamental things (at least memory management) really well.
- andrekandre 5y agojust a guess, but probably they are saying from a developer perspective; there are less options in macos (many libraries/packages not available) and less room to customize things
- drewzero1 5y agoIt's possible to appreciate certain aspects of a product and still dislike the product as a whole. I appreciate how relatively easy it is to understand Windows' directory structure (for example) but that doesn't mean I want to use the whole OS on my own time.
- rightbyte 5y agoYe, I dislike the Unixy way of mounting hard drives where ever. There is some mental calmness of having the root of the HD at a drive letter in "My Computer" ...
- TimeBearingDown 5y agoLinux disk management tools were my gateway drug. diskpart and diskmgmt.msc are fine, but gparted does nearly anything feasible, it’s indispensable. Then you just run ‘mount’ and ‘df -h’ a lot and in the end that’s similar to ‘net use’ on Windows + My Computer wrapped into one. “Everything is a file” is a useful paradigm, and then just think of your disk as an image file in a fixed spot. Sorry if this winds up a ramble or you’re well aware.
- pdpi 5y agoSure, but there is a difference between "I don't like this" and "this is crap". I can 100% see how macOS might rub people the wrong way, and there are definitely some dubious choices in there from a purely technical point of view, but that doesn't really amount to "crap overall".
- firecall 5y agoIt really is. Even if you dont like the macOS GUI, I dont think any reasonable evaluation could call macOS 'crap overall'. Distros like Ubuntu, are excellent, but they just dont have feature parity with macOS.
- smoldesu 5y ago> I dont think any reasonable evaluation could call macOS 'crap overall'. Would it not depend on the workload? I hear a lot of web developers and content creators who share this sentiment; fair enough. But there's a number of consumer markets who would indeed drag MacOS for lacking 32-bit support, decent container compatibility or a package manager. It's overall less compatible with software than Windows or even Linux, and if you want to do development outside of the Apple ecosystem or besides the web, getting a proper development environment up and running is an exercise on the treadmill of neverending maintenance. It certainly doesn't look appealing to a gaming crowd or people writing software for Windows (with M1 cross-compiling is dead in the water), it can't do Boot Camp anymore and it's a nightmare for DevOps folks who want to run Docker tests on their laptop. I can understand who likes MacOS and why they'd like it, but if you do anything other than text editing or media encoding for a living then the benefits of using MacOS start to deteriorate very quickly.
- brailsafe 5y agoYa, but that is still a kind of 1 star until they do x kind of thing. Meanwhile if a macOS fan was to say they think Windows is crap because for some reason they feel the need to re-install the OS every month to solve some inexplicable stability problem, it would probably make a bit more sense. I'm a gamer and have a PC only for that purpose, I don't feel like my mac is crap because it doesn't play some of them.
- elzbardico 5y agoMaybe I am old, but modern operating systems are so much better than what I had in the 90's that honestly I don't care too much to micro-optimize my personal usage with the perfect operating system. As long as they do power management and external displays well, I don't care too much if using Mac OS, Fedora or Windows 10/11 with WSL.