2 ms·
>The lipid hypothesis used to be a theory >Science started looking at the lipid theory and it's all fraud. I'm sorry, but even the most cursory of google sear
by 1415926535 5y ago
>The lipid hypothesis used to be a theory
>Science started looking at the lipid theory and it's all fraud.
I'm sorry, but even the most cursory of google searches indicates that this is not at all correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipid_hypothesis#Consensus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipid_hypothesis#Consensus
- sleepingadmin 5y agoMight I point out that 'hypothesis' is no better than 'guess' https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypothesis https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypothesis In fact, the lipid hypothesis having used to be a theory and being downgraded to hypothesis probably makes it far less than a hypothesis. The wikipage uses a single source for this 'consensus' and look again that magical date of 2017. What does this 'consensus' really conclude? >Consistent evidence from numerous and multiple different types of clinical and genetic studies unequivocally establishes that LDL causes ASCVD. The 'consensus' is that LDL causes illness. I dont believe that's in contention. What we are discussing is what causes LDL to cause illness and we are discovering decades of bad science.